Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 41.6 to 33.3.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index37.041.3
Released2025-06-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding13731361
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts13771374
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math13731359
Omni-MATH48%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert13731339
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English13691363
LMArena Chinese14041417
LMArena French13881391
LMArena German13891355
LMArena Japanese13591342
LMArena Korean13601351
LMArena Russian13731368
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following13671344
IFEval81%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query13731366
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text13791377
LMArena Creative Writing13671359
LMArena Multi-Turn13661387
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper