Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen Plus
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 34.8 to 22.0.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.6 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1328 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1362 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1338 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1303 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1365 | 1325 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1358 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen Plus?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.