Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Nova 2 Lite
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 4.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 32.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 36.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 27.1% for Nova 2 Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2025-12-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2 Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1385 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | 27.1% |
Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1364 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1359 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | 5.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1358 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Nova 2 Lite: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1364 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1381 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1343 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1271 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1343 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1373 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1335 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1335 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1362 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1291 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1338 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 4.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova 2 Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nova 2 Lite?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?
Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Nova 2 Lite share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.