Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 47.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1270 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1264 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1274 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1248 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1245 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1301 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1275 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.