Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen Plus
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1303 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen Plus?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen Plus share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.