Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Solar Pro4 leads 42.1 to 29.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.