Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 43.5 to 29.2.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1440 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1456 |
| LMArena German | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1411 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Longcat Flash Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.