Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 43.4 to 29.2.
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |
Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1426 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1442 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1452 |
| LMArena German | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1420 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1428 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.