Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 87.9% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 43.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-06-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 149.97 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.