Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3 Max leads 41.6 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 66.7% for Qwen3 Max.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 142.38 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1446 |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1455 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1462 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1419 |
Long Context Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3 Max share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.