Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3 Max leads 41.6 to 29.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 66.7% for Qwen3 Max.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3 Max specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.143.7
Released2025-02-052025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06142.38
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—28.3%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
MATH Level 583.5%97.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1446

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond65.7%72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1455

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English—1429
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1438

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3 Max
LMArena Text—1439
LMArena Creative Writing—1402
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3 Max share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper