Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M3 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.9% for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 146.95 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1447 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 90.9% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1461 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1433 |
Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1442 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M3 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.