Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.9% for Qwen3.7 Max.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 153.68 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1481 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.