Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

51.8

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 48.0 to 22.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.2% for GLM-5.3-Flash.
  • GLM-5.3-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index39.151.8
Released2025-02-052026-08-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1440

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#31)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSWE—63.4%
FrontierCode—31.8%
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
CursorBench—36.8%
LMArena WebDev—1609
FrontierSWE—18.1%
SciCode—51.6%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1508
ALE-Bench—303.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.2 (#47)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
APEX-Agents—52.8%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.0 (#42)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06151.88
ARC-AGI-2—65.8%
ARC-AGI-1—91%
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—14%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1491
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
LiveBench65.1%—

Math GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.3 (#47)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—55.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.9%
ProofBench—21%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1500
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#36)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
GPQA Diamond65.7%90.2%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1513

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.8 (#27)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Vision—1296

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.0 (#25)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1462
LMArena Chinese—1527
LMArena French—1496
LMArena German—1470
LMArena Japanese—1429
LMArena Korean—1446
LMArena Russian—1469
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.5 (#20)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1478

Long Context GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.4 (#39)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3-Flash leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.3 (#50)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Text—1471
LMArena Creative Writing—1442
LMArena Multi-Turn—1467
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-5.3-Flash better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.1 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper