Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-4.5-Air
Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 41.6 to 29.2.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-07-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1397 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1379 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1370 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1426 |
| LMArena French | — | 1399 |
| LMArena German | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1386 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1354 |
Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1371 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-4.5-Air?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.5-Air share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.