Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen Turbo
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 14.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 56.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 41.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.