Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mixtral 8x22B

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 15.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 24.2% for Mixtral 8x22B.
  • Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index39.127.1
Released2025-02-052024-04-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1166
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06122.03
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1150
DTBench—55.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
ForecastBench—56.3
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
MATH Level 583.5%24.2%
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1184

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
GPQA Diamond65.7%34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
Confabulations18.4%—
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English—1128
LMArena Chinese—1116
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
IFEval—72.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1147

Long Context Mixtral 8x22B leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text—1162
LMArena Creative Writing—1141
WildBench—71.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1130
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x22B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper