Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs o1-mini
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and o1-mini in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 22.3 to 8.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Instruction Following: 83.4% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 65.4% for o1-mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 32.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 48% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 57.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1333 |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 89.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1358 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 18.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1316 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena French | — | 1293 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1303 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 65.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1304 |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1320 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 40.9% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1244 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than o1-mini?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or o1-mini better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and o1-mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.