Model comparison

o1-mini vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 3 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 24.8 to 8.9.

Side by side

o1-mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
o1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index33.738.6
Released2024-09-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o1-mini: 35.1 (#218), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13621316
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.3 (#112), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o1-mini: 8.9 (#340), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13331299
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
ARC-AGI-114%—
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82—
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Too close to call

o1-mini: 33.7 (#168), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13581305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
LiveBench Math62%—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Too close to call

o1-mini: 34.8 (#180), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13161279
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
Confabulations18.6%—

Multilingual Too close to call

o1-mini: 43.8 (#177), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English12891290
LMArena Chinese13141331
LMArena Russian12831324
LMArena French1292—
LMArena German1278—
LMArena Japanese1245—
LMArena Korean1223—
LMArena Spanish1302—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o1-mini: 67.0 (#200), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13041287
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

o1-mini: 40.1 (#156), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13211307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o1-mini: 48.6 (#196), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13171321
LMArena Creative Writing12441328
LMArena Multi-Turn13141292
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper