Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 63.1.
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-06-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1209 |
Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1202 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1216 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1214 |
| LMArena French | — | 1197 |
| LMArena German | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1195 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1203 |
Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1225 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1214 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.