Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.2

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 52.9 to 42.7.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3 32B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.939.2
Released2024-06-142025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked1726

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Coding12091358
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021334
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Math12161399
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%

Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Expert11711362
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%

Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English12061317
LMArena Chinese12141357
LMArena German11921341
LMArena Russian12191311
LMArena French1197—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following12031305

Long Context Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Longer Query12251327
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 32B
LMArena Text12251340
LMArena Creative Writing12031297
LMArena Multi-Turn12141331

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3 32B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper