Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen3 32B
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 40.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 65.7% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 11.3% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1334 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1399 |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1362 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3 32B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1305 |
Long Context Too close to call
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 32B?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3 32B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.