Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Muse Glimmer leads 42.1 to 29.2.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1396 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1399 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Muse Glimmer share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.