Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.4 to 29.2.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.