Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Medium
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Mistral Medium leads 42.9 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 59.5% for Mistral Medium.
- Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 8% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 40.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1434 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 763.98 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.7% |
Reasoning Mistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 50% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1426 |
| DTBench | — | 75.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 26.1% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 26.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 81.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 32.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 59.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 22.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1172 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1447 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena German | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1433 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1398 |
Long Context Mistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1406 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Medium?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Medium better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.