Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4.1
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-4.1 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 63.9% for GPT-4.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GPT-4.1: 34.4 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 52.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 48.5% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 39.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 39% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1391 |
| CadEval | — | 42% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 558.1 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1: 34.7 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 54% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GPT-4.1: 11.7 (#339)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 2.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 136.78 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 52.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1384 |
| DTBench | — | 68.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 25.6% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.5 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GPT-4.1: 22.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 83% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 38.3% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 47.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1370 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GPT-4.1: 37.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 66.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 31.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1364 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1: 38.2 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1211 |
| GeoBench | — | 72% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4.1: 49.4 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1382 |
| LMArena German | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1376 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GPT-4.1: 71.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 83.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1367 |
Long Context GPT-4.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GPT-4.1: 40.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 63.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1385 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GPT-4.1: 57.6 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1363 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1420 |
| WildBench | — | 85.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1398 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4.1?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4.1 better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.1 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 has 52.