Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.7 to 29.2.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.