Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiniMax-M2 leads 40.5 to 29.2.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1370 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1357 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena French | — | 1335 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1328 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1331 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1361 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.