Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 38.8 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1269 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1250 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1250 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1253 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 37.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.