Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 43.0 to 29.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.