Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 37.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1504 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1482 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.