Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 36.3.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
MiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index48.539.2
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding15041316
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14821299
CritPt12%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14681304
ProofBench63%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert15011279

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English14341290
LMArena Chinese15111331
LMArena Russian14091324
LMArena French1475—
LMArena Spanish1456—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14631287

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14631307

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text14551321
LMArena Creative Writing14001328
LMArena Multi-Turn14511292

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper