Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 4 Maverick in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 38.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 15.6% for Llama 4 Maverick.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 15.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21% |
| SciCode | — | 33.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 24.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1302 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 172.97 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 132.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1281 |
| DTBench | — | 61.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 15.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 73% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 20.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 42.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1299 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 67% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 22.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1259 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1142 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 31.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1277 |
| LMArena French | — | 1259 |
| LMArena German | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1293 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 90.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1267 |
Long Context Llama 4 Maverick leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 46.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1267 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 860 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1289 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 4 Maverick share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.