Model comparison

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Mistral Large 3

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.4

Rank #63 Confirmed

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

38.6

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Large 3 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 31.4 to 14.6.

Side by side

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Mistral Large 3 specifications
Kimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
ProviderMoonshot AIMistral AI
Noometry Index45.438.6
Released2025-11-062025-12-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked2124

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166), Mistral Large 3: 34.1 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena WebDev13221230
LMArena Coding14541447

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72), Mistral Large 3: 14.6 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14281429
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—7.5%
Chess Puzzles20%—
Thematic Generalization—23%

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62), Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Math14291415
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202583.1%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64), Mistral Large 3: 35.5 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Expert14391421
GPQA Diamond84.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, Mistral Large 3: 37.6 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Mistral Large 3 leads

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104), Mistral Large 3: 52.6 (#79)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Non-English13981412
LMArena Chinese14571448
LMArena French14251456
LMArena German13901438
LMArena Japanese13561399
LMArena Korean13291384
LMArena Russian13901412
LMArena Spanish14071437

Instruction Following Too close to call

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103), Mistral Large 3: 74.1 (#104)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Instruction Following14031402

Long Context Too close to call

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99), Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#102)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Longer Query14151413

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99), Mistral Large 3: 60.2 (#100)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 Thinking TurboMistral Large 3
LMArena Text14151427
LMArena Creative Writing13731385
LMArena Multi-Turn14141429
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Mistral Large 3?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Mistral Large 3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper