Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 43.8 to 29.1.
- Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1483 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1443 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1443 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1438 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1430 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1427 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.