Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is EnigmaEval: 0.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 18.8% for GPT-5 Pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 46.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-10-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 272K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $120 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 18.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 150.28 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5 Pro?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-5 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.