Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Mini in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GPT-5 Mini leads 41.9 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 69.4% for GPT-5 Mini.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 64.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 59.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 39.7% |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1406 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 799.77 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.38 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 34.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 55.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -31.18 |
Reasoning GPT-5 Mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 8.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 145.52 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 54.3% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1380 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 34.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math GPT-5 Mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 72.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1378 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 75% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 13.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 19.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1379 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1202 |
| VPCT | — | 40.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1385 |
| LMArena French | — | 1386 |
| LMArena German | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1355 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 92.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1357 |
Long Context GPT-5 Mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 69.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5 Mini leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1325 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.1% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| WildBench | — | 85.5% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1363 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5 Mini?
GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-5 Mini better for coding?
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-5 Mini share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Mini has 60.