Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-4.7
GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and GLM-4.7 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.7 leads 42.8 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 83.3% for GLM-4.7.
- GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-12-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| SciCode | — | 45.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |
Reasoning GLM-4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 143.51 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1443 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1423 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge GLM-4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1424 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena French | — | 1432 |
| LMArena German | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1411 |
Long Context GLM-4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1432 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GLM-4.7?
GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GLM-4.7 better for coding?
GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GLM-4.7 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.