Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5.4 nano
GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.4 nano in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 41.6 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 78.5% for GPT-5.4 nano.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 41.9 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.1 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 46.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 49.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1404 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,005 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 145.78 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 39.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 51.5% |
| CritPt | — | 9.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 30% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1380 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| DTBench | — | 80.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 36.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.3 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math GPT-5.4 nano leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.7 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 44.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 87.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1406 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 25.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 6.3% |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.8 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 78.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 11.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1397 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 36.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1196 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 48.8 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1391 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1368 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), GPT-5.4 nano: 72.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1362 |
Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1365 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1382 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5.4 nano?
GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?
GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.4 nano share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.