Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 1B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Gemma 3 1B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 21.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 19.9% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 1B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 1B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.