Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.2

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 7.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3 32B specifications
Gemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index21.139.2
Released2025-03-122025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked426

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%
LMArena Coding—1358

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 32B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%48.7%

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
Chess Puzzles0%5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1334
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Qwen3 32B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%66.9%
LMArena Math—1399

Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond19.9%65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%
LMArena Expert—1362

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English—1317
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1311

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following—1305

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1327

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3 32B
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1297
LMArena Multi-Turn—1331

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3 32B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper