Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Solar Pro4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1416 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1381 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1385 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.