Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 43.5 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 43.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1440 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1445 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1411 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1425 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1418 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Longcat Flash Chat share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.