Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 8.6.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1250 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1427 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1227 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1267 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1271 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Is Magistral Medium or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.