Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 24.9 to 8.7.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1318 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1302 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1249 | 1315 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1222 | 1272 |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1268 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1269 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Medium or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 38.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.