Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 25.5 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1307 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1286 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1277 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1341 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1284 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.