Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 63.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1503 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1488 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 84.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1481 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1503 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1477 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1483 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1493 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1477 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.