Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 51 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 51 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 32.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 38.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 83.1% for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 45.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-03-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 78 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | 53.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 83.1% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 54% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 85.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1452 |
| CadEval | 30% | 64% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | 30.3% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 70.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 89.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1455 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 82.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 79.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 145.32 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 82.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 90.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1450 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 10.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | 74.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1452 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1263 |
| GeoBench | 77% | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1451 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1472 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1461 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1461 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1473 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 80.6% |
| IFEval | 84.1% | 84% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1437 |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 91.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1449 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1454 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1421 |
| WildBench | 80% | 85.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1453 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 67.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?
51 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.