Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 46.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 39.2% for Magistral Medium and 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Magistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index35.245.2
Released2025-03-172026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$5$0.87
Results tracked2227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
SciCode39.2%50.2%
LMArena Coding13191503
LMArena WebDev—1479
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
CritPt0.3%4%
LMArena Hard Prompts12671488
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math12501481
ProofBench—22%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert12231503

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English12321449
LMArena Chinese12271507
LMArena French12671488
LMArena German12481458
LMArena Japanese11751412
LMArena Korean11251437
LMArena Russian12241450
LMArena Spanish12711471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12541477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12951483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text12551465
LMArena Creative Writing12451440
LMArena Multi-Turn12751477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper