Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B DeepSeek

35.5

Rank #226 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 74.4 to 61.6.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderDeepSeekMeituan
Noometry Index35.542.1
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 36.1 (#212), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
BigCodeBench Instruct43.9%—
LiveBench Coding33.7%—
LMArena Coding—1471
BigCodeBench Complete54.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 28.1 (#94), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
BALROG19.5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 18.2 (#284), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
Chess Puzzles1%—
LiveBench Reasoning52.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1440
LiveBench Data Analysis45.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.44—
LiveBench45.5%—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 34.5 (#194), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
LiveBench Math59.4%—
LMArena Math—1442

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 35.7 (#182), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
GPQA Diamond64.1%—
LMArena Expert—1454

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 61.6 (#243), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
LiveBench Instruction Following55.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1411

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query—1425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 49.6 (#188), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text—1427
LMArena Creative Writing—1388
LMArena Multi-Turn—1418
LiveBench Language26.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Longcat Flash Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has 14 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper