Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3 14B
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 23.8 to 18.1.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 35.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1250 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1279 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3 14B?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 36.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.